Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42303943›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

AI-Assisted Classification of Mandibular First Molars According to the Presence of an Additional Distal Canal on CBCT Images: Automated CBCT Mandibular Canal Detection.

Eda Gursu Sahin, Zuhal Ovuz, Zafer Civelek, Mustafa Teke, Osman Guler, Taha Etem

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eda Gursu SahinFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri, Turkey. edagursusahin@karatekin.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9226-3454
Zuhal OvuzFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-9793
Zafer CivelekFaculty of Engineering, Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6838-3149
Mustafa TekeFaculty of Engineering, Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7262-4918
Osman GulerFaculty of Engineering, Computer Engineering, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-5973
Taha EtemFaculty of Engineering, Computer Engineering, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-5008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hybrid fusion architecture based on deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) was implemented for AI-assisted classification of mandibular first molars (MFMs) according to the presence or absence of an additional distal canal on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. The hybrid deep fusion architecture was trained using an augmented dataset derived from 253 CBCT scans, including 175 three-canalled and 78 four-canalled MFMs. The original CBCT scans were first divided at the scan/tooth level into training, validation, and test subsets, and data augmentation was subsequently applied separately within each subset to prevent cross-subset leakage of augmented derivatives. The reference standard was established through consensus between an independently calibrated dentomaxillofacial radiologist and an endodontist. Primary diagnostic performance was evaluated on the 38 original, independent, non-augmented test cases at the patient/tooth level. When the presence of an additional distal canal/four-canal morphology was defined as the clinically positive condition, the proposed Fusion IncepDenseCBAM model achieved an accuracy of 97.4% (95% CI: 92.3-100.0%), sensitivity of 91.7% (95% CI: 76.0-100.0%), specificity of 100.0% (95% CI: 100.0-100.0%), positive predictive value of 100.0% (95% CI: 100.0-100.0%), negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI: 89.2-100.0%), F1-score of 95.7% (95% CI: 83.5-100.0%), and AUC of 0.958 (95% CI: 0.880-1.000). The model also demonstrated high agreement and balanced classification performance, with an MCC of 0.940 (95% CI: 0.812-1.000) and Cohen's kappa of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.817-1.000). These findings indicate that the proposed hybrid fusion architecture shows promising preliminary diagnostic performance for detecting an additional distal canal on CBCT images. However, further external validation using larger independent datasets is required before clinical implementation as a decision-support tool in endodontic diagnostic workflows.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAutomated pattern recognitionCone-beam computed tomographyDigital radiologyEndodontics

Identifiers

PMID42303943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.