ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Forensic performance of dental age estimation methods at legal age thresholds in Latin America: a scoping review.
Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDental age estimation (DAE) is a central component of forensic odontology (FO), particularly in contexts in which legally defined age thresholds determine criminal responsibility. Given the population-related variability in dental development, the use of methods validated in the target population is essential. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize DAE methods applied to Latin American (LATAM) populations over the past decade, with a specific emphasis on their forensic performance at legally significant thresholds of 14, 16, and 18 years.
methodsA scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, and Redalyc databases were searched for full-text articles published between 2014 and 2024. Eligible studies applied DAE methods to LATAM populations in children, adolescents, or young adults and reported outcomes relevant to at least one predefined legal age threshold. Data were charted on population characteristics, imaging modalities, methods applied, and reported performance at the thresholds of interest.
resultsSixty-three studies were included. Brazil accounted for the highest research output, followed by Chile and Peru, with most studies relying on panoramic radiographs (PRs). Demirjian-based approaches were the most frequently applied, whereas Cameriere's third molar maturity index (I
conclusionAlthough recent LATAM research reflects increasing methodological diversity and population-specific validation efforts, substantial uncertainty persists regarding legally decisive age thresholds. Current DAE methods frequently fall short of the accuracy required for forensic and judicial applications, underscoring the need for cautious interpretation and further refinement, focusing on performance-based forensic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42303898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.