Observational studyClinical rheumatology2026
Risk management plan adherence and clinical outcomes in patients receiving targeted therapies.
Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe expanding use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs) has substantially improved outcomes in autoimmune diseases but is accompanied by complex safety concerns. Risk management plans (RMPs) have been introduced to mitigate treatment-related risks; however, real-world adherence to these strategies and their broader clinical impact remain incompletely characterized.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of adult patients with autoimmune diseases who received bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, or biosimilars at a tertiary medical center in southern Taiwan between October 2014 and December 2023. Patients were classified into RMP and non-RMP groups based on completion of predefined pre-treatment safety assessments within 6 months prior to therapy initiation, including pulmonary and tuberculosis evaluation, viral hepatitis screening, and documentation of cardiovascular and malignancy risk factors. Clinical outcomes included Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), treatment-related respiratory adverse events, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression and time-to-event analyses were performed to evaluate associations between RMP implementation and clinical outcomes.
resultsAmong 1,078 patients included, only 348 (32.3%) fulfilled the predefined RMP criteria prior to treatment initiation. Compared with the RMP group, patients without RMP exhibited significantly higher incidences of PJP (11.9% vs. 2.3%), MACE (8.5% vs. 2.6%), treatment-related respiratory adverse events (50.4% vs. 42.8%), and all-cause mortality (7.3% vs. 1.7%) (all p < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, RMP implementation remained independently associated with lower risks of PJP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.18, 95% CI 0.15-0.84), MACE (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.71), and all-cause mortality (aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.61). Subgroup and time-to-event analyses demonstrated that anti-CD20 therapy was associated with the highest risk of early-onset PJP, MACE, and mortality, with most events occurring within the first three to six months following treatment. DISCUSSION: In real-world clinical practice, adherence to predefined RMPs prior to targeted therapy initiation is suboptimal and is strongly associated with clinically meaningful differences in infectious, cardiovascular, and survival outcomes. These findings suggest that RMP implementation is associated with benefits extending beyond infection prevention and underscore the importance of standardized, consistently applied risk management strategies, particularly for high-risk targeted therapies such as anti-CD20 agents. Key Points • Adherence to predefined risk management plans (RMPs) before initiating biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs remains suboptimal in real-world practice. • Implementation of RMPs is associated with lower risks of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. • Lack of structured pre-treatment safety assessment may contribute to early severe complications after therapy initiation. • Anti-CD20 therapy is associated with a higher risk of early adverse outcomes, underscoring the need for careful risk stratification and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.