ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
Venous Intervention in Children: Current Practice and Controversies.
Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paediatric Interventional Radiology: Growing Up and Looking Ahead.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although anticoagulation remains the cornerstone of treatment for pediatric deep vein thrombosis, there is increased utility of endovascular interventions including catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in severe cases. Chronic venous occlusion and venous compression syndromes, including May-Thurner, venous thoracic outlet, and Nutcracker syndromes, present additional challenges and, where clinically indicated, often require angioplasty with or without venous stenting. Venous stenting in children shows promise but raises concerns about vessel growth and reintervention. Pediatric-specific data remain limited, and interventions must account for patient size, skeletal maturity, and long-term outcomes. Pediatric venous interventions lag behind adult practice, underscoring the need for specialized expertise and further research. A multidisciplinary, individualized approach is essential to optimize outcomes and minimize complications in children.
Identifiers
42303878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.