ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Overview of State-of-the-Art Learning-Based Classification Methods in Medical Imaging.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning-based image classification has become central to modern medical imaging, but the field is changing rapidly: foundation models, vision-language models (VLMs), and label-efficient pretraining are reshaping which methods are clinically useful. This review focuses on the state of the art rather than re-explaining well-established models. We summarize learning paradigms, contrast classical machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) families, and emphasize advances most relevant to clinical translation: medical foundation models, multimodal VLMs, hybrid CNN-transformer architectures, diffusion-based augmentation, self-supervised pretraining, federated learning, and efficient deployment. We also discuss modality-specific issues across X-ray, CT, MRI, PET/SPECT, ultrasound, OCT, endoscopy, microscopy, and optical/molecular/infrared imaging because model choice depends strongly on image structure, annotation cost, and workflow. Finally, we outline persistent clinical challenges, data diversity and bias, rare-condition detection, annotation noise, explainability, calibration, and equitable performance, and the methods that mitigate them. The aim is to provide biomedical engineers and clinicians with a compact, clinically grounded reference for selecting and validating AI-based classifiers for real medical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42303852What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.