Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42303852›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Overview of State-of-the-Art Learning-Based Classification Methods in Medical Imaging.

Nafiseh Ghaffar Nia, Rayyan Manwar, Kamran Avanaki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nafiseh Ghaffar NiaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S Morgan St, MC 063, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Rayyan ManwarDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S Morgan St, MC 063, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Kamran AvanakiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S Morgan St, MC 063, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA. avanaki@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1437-8456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning-based image classification has become central to modern medical imaging, but the field is changing rapidly: foundation models, vision-language models (VLMs), and label-efficient pretraining are reshaping which methods are clinically useful. This review focuses on the state of the art rather than re-explaining well-established models. We summarize learning paradigms, contrast classical machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) families, and emphasize advances most relevant to clinical translation: medical foundation models, multimodal VLMs, hybrid CNN-transformer architectures, diffusion-based augmentation, self-supervised pretraining, federated learning, and efficient deployment. We also discuss modality-specific issues across X-ray, CT, MRI, PET/SPECT, ultrasound, OCT, endoscopy, microscopy, and optical/molecular/infrared imaging because model choice depends strongly on image structure, annotation cost, and workflow. Finally, we outline persistent clinical challenges, data diversity and bias, rare-condition detection, annotation noise, explainability, calibration, and equitable performance, and the methods that mitigate them. The aim is to provide biomedical engineers and clinicians with a compact, clinically grounded reference for selecting and validating AI-based classifiers for real medical workflows.

Indexed as

Clinical translationDeep learningFoundation modelsMedical imagingVision–language models

Identifiers

PMID42303852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.