ArticleScientific reports2026
Acoustic deep learning for defect detection in aluminium wheel rims.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable detection of structural defects in aluminium wheel rims remains challenging in routine workshop diagnostics, where inspection is primarily based on visual and organoleptic assessment supported by operator experience. This study proposes RimNet, a deep-learning-based diagnostic framework for automated condition assessment of aluminium wheel rims using their acoustic response to a single impulse excitation. The method combines short-time Fourier transform representations with a convolutional neural network and incorporates domain filtering and hard-negative mining to improve the separability of defect-related conditions. The dataset comprised 930 labelled examples representing a broad spectrum of real-world rim states, including geometric deviations, material defects, and serviceable conditions. RimNet achieved strong classification performance, reaching 96.9% accuracy at the file level, while no wheel-level misclassifications were observed under the adopted evaluation protocol. Analysis of uncertainty measures-including prediction margins, entropy, Brier score, and energy-based indicators-revealed clear relationships between prediction stability and defect type. Misclassified cases were associated with reduced classification margins and increased uncertainty, particularly in samples influenced by geometric variability. The RimNet Predictor application enables real-time diagnostics and provides uncertainty estimates for individual rims. Because the proposed approach relies solely on microphone-based acquisition and does not require modifications to wheel balancing equipment, it can be readily integrated into workshop and service environments. These results demonstrate the potential of acoustic deep-learning-based diagnostics for structural health monitoring of lightweight mechanical components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.