ArticleCommunications engineering2026
End-to-end robust system discovery in electrical dynamical systems using scientific machine learning.
Article in Communications engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- End-to-end robust system discovery in electrical dynamical systems using scientific machine learning.Communications engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
System discovery is an important part of the power systems asset management process. In this paper, we introduce an end-to-end approach for robust system discovery for a class of electrical dynamical systems with polynomial dynamics. To that end, we provide a theoretical analysis of the problem setting and the solution approach using a particular Scientific Machine Learning method called Physics-Informed Machine Learning. We introduce model architecture and training and validation methods for deterministic as well as probabilistic approaches to predict the solution to pertinent inverse problems and propose a sampling method to make the predictions robust to data sparsity. With empirical evidence drawn from a case study of thermal modeling of electrical induction machines, we establish the merits of the proposed method and discuss the implications of this research on possible future directions. In particular, we benchmark our proposed end-to-end method with multiple deterministic and probabilistic approaches and show that it outperforms all but one baseline in terms of performance in a range of 6% to 78% reduction of validation error. The drop in performance (increase in validation error) in our end-to-end probabilistic approach compared to a Bayesian approach is compensated by a large reduction (86%) in the computation time, making our method more balanced in terms of performance and cost. The experimental results establish that our end-to-end approach outperforms the baseline methods by demonstrating consistent balancing among performance and computation cost.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.