Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42303792›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Biologic immunomodulators and spinal fusion: evidence, mechanisms, and perioperative considerations.

Patrick Kramer, Vikas Vattipally, Ritika Chanda, Katholiki Troumouchi, Neel Patel, Madeline Forshey, S Farzad Maroufi, A Daniel Davidar, Tej D Azad, Yuanxuan Xia and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Patrick KramerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, USA. pkrame16@jh.edu.
Vikas VattipallyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Ritika ChandaGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington D.C., USA.
Katholiki TroumouchiUniversity of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Neel PatelWest Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, USA.
Madeline ForsheyGeorgetown University, Washington D.C., USA.
S Farzad MaroufiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
A Daniel DavidarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Tej D AzadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Yuanxuan XiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Daniel LubelskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Nicholas TheodoreDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, USA. ntheodore@arizona.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Biologic immunomodulators are increasingly used across autoimmune, inflammatory, oncologic, and metabolic diseases, resulting in a growing population of patients undergoing spinal fusion while receiving these agents. Because immune pathways targeted by biologic therapies play essential, time-dependent roles in bone graft incorporation, this review examines how pharmacologic modulation of these pathways may affect fusion outcomes and perioperative risk.Methods We synthesized mechanistic, translational, and clinical evidence examining the impact of major classes of biologic immunomodulators on spinal fusion biology. Preclinical, translational, and available clinical data were reviewed with attention to drug class, timing of exposure, and host factors.Results Preclinical and translational studies consistently demonstrate that disruption of cytokine signaling, immune cell activation, or osteoblast-osteoclast coupling can impair angiogenesis, progenitor recruitment, and graft remodeling. Clinical data, while limited and heterogeneous, suggest variable associations with postoperative complications and fusion outcomes depending on the specific agent and timing of exposure. Perioperative management strategies for biologic therapies remain heterogeneous across spine surgery practice.Conclusion Biologic immunomodulators have the potential to dysregulate normal bone healing, particularly when exposure occurs during early or transitional phases of fusion. This review provides a biologically grounded framework to inform perioperative risk stratification and management in patients receiving these agents who undergo spinal fusion.

Indexed as

B-cell inhibitorsBiologic immunomodulatorDenosumabInterleukin inhibitorsNon-unionSpinal fusionT-cell inhibitorsTNF-α inhibitorsWound healing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.