ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Biologic immunomodulators and spinal fusion: evidence, mechanisms, and perioperative considerations.
Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Biologic immunomodulators are increasingly used across autoimmune, inflammatory, oncologic, and metabolic diseases, resulting in a growing population of patients undergoing spinal fusion while receiving these agents. Because immune pathways targeted by biologic therapies play essential, time-dependent roles in bone graft incorporation, this review examines how pharmacologic modulation of these pathways may affect fusion outcomes and perioperative risk.Methods We synthesized mechanistic, translational, and clinical evidence examining the impact of major classes of biologic immunomodulators on spinal fusion biology. Preclinical, translational, and available clinical data were reviewed with attention to drug class, timing of exposure, and host factors.Results Preclinical and translational studies consistently demonstrate that disruption of cytokine signaling, immune cell activation, or osteoblast-osteoclast coupling can impair angiogenesis, progenitor recruitment, and graft remodeling. Clinical data, while limited and heterogeneous, suggest variable associations with postoperative complications and fusion outcomes depending on the specific agent and timing of exposure. Perioperative management strategies for biologic therapies remain heterogeneous across spine surgery practice.Conclusion Biologic immunomodulators have the potential to dysregulate normal bone healing, particularly when exposure occurs during early or transitional phases of fusion. This review provides a biologically grounded framework to inform perioperative risk stratification and management in patients receiving these agents who undergo spinal fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42303792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.