Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42303767›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Clinical Performance of GalaFLEX® (Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate) Scaffold Application in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

Leonardo Adolfo Spuras Stella, Bruna Lee Damasceno, Giovanna Valente Costa, Nicole Martins Stella, Vanessa Borges Valente Stella, Rosa Andréa Nogueira Laiso, Rose Eli Grassi Rici, Durvanei Augusto Maria, Gustavo Henrique Doná Rodrigues Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leonardo Adolfo Spuras StellaGraduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruna Lee DamascenoPontifical Catholic University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Giovanna Valente CostaClínica Stella, Private Practice, Americana, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nicole Martins StellaClínica Stella, Private Practice, Americana, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa Borges Valente StellaClínica Stella, Private Practice, Americana, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosa Andréa Nogueira LaisoGraduate Program in Anatomy of Domestic and Wild Animals, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rose Eli Grassi RiciGraduate Program in Anatomy of Domestic and Wild Animals, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Durvanei Augusto MariaGraduate Program in Anatomy of Domestic and Wild Animals, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Henrique Doná Rodrigues AlmeidaLaboratory of Development and Innovation, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, Brazil. gustavohdra@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-8250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoft-tissue support remains a critical factor in both reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Bioresorbable synthetic scaffolds, such as poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB), have been introduced as an alternative to acellular dermal matrices to provide structural reinforcement while gradually integrating into host tissue. This study evaluates the clinical indications, surgical applications, and early postoperative outcomes associated with the use of a bioresorbable P4HB scaffold in implant-based breast surgery.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent breast surgery with P4HB scaffold reinforcement. Surgical indications were analyzed per treated breast and categorized as oncologic or non-oncologic. Associated procedures, including fat grafting and implant exchange versus primary implantation, were recorded when available. Postoperative complications were assessed per patient. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize surgical indications, technical approaches, and outcomes.

resultsA total of 31 patients and 52 treated breasts were included. Surgical indications were evenly distributed between breasts with and without disease. All breasts with disease were managed in the context of post-mastectomy reconstruction. In breasts without disease, scaffold reinforcement was primarily used for contralateral symmetrization, followed by primary or revisional aesthetic procedures. Fat grafting was frequently performed as an adjunct technique. Most cases involved primary implant placement, with a small proportion representing revision surgery. The overall postoperative complication rate was low, with the majority of patients experiencing an uneventful recovery.

conclusionP4HB scaffold reinforcement demonstrated a favorable safety profile and versatile clinical applicability in both reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Its integration into implant-based procedures, often in combination with adjunctive techniques, supports its role as a reliable option for soft-tissue support. Further studies with longer follow-up and comparative designs are needed to better define long-term outcomes and optimize indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsBreast ImplantationHydroxybutyratesMammaplastyPolyestersTissue ScaffoldsAdultBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedPolyhydroxybutyratesHydroxybutyratesPolyestersPolyhydroxybutyratesBiomaterialBreast surgeryPoly-4-hydroxybutyrateSynthetic mesh

Identifiers

PMID42303767
PMCPMC13493449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.