ArticleScientific reports2026
Biomechanical analysis of single leg deadlift under the effect of instability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The single leg deadlift (SLD), one of resistance exercises, is widely prescribed to enhance muscular strength and balance due to its inherent unstable, unilateral nature. However, this instability may limit joint mobility and diminish strength training efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effect of surface-induced instability during SLD performance. Thirty healthy adult males performed SLDs under stable surface (flat ground) and unstable surface (foam-pad). Inertial measurement unit (IMU) and surface electromyography (EMG) were employed to assess joint kinematics, such as range of motion (ROM) and joint sway, and muscle activation patterns during stretch-shortening cycle. The unstable surface significantly increases ankle joint sway by 80.00% during the eccentric phase and 99.62% during the concentric phase (p < 0.05). While ankle joint ROM remains unaltered, instability reduces ROM at hip and knee joints by 6.04° and 3.81°, respectively. EMG analyses revealed that surface instability elevated Gluteus Maximus activation during the eccentric phase (13.27%) and Tibialis Anterior activation during both eccentric (6.56%) and concentric (15.21%) phases. Notably, Biceps Femoris activation increases across both phases under unstable conditions. Surface-induced instability during the SLD augments neuromuscular demand, particularly in the balance and stabilizing ankle musculature. However, this instability reduces hip and knee joint mobility, which may compromise the mechanical loading required for strength adaptation. These findings underscore the need for strategic integration of instability in resistance training programs depending on specific performance goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.