ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of a psychological risk indicator and its association with sports injuries in football players.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence suggests that psychological factors such as stress, anxiety, perfectionism, coping resources, and sleep quality may modulate sport-injury risk, supporting an integrative approach to athlete monitoring beyond physiological indicators. This study aimed to develop a composite psychological injury-risk index grounded in the Psycholight framework and examine its association with injury burden in male and female football players. A total of 281 youth-to-senior players aged 16-32 years completed validated self-report measures assessing sport-related psychological characteristics, maladaptive perfectionism, trait anxiety, emotional symptoms, and sleep quality, including the CPRD, MPSI, STAI-Trait, DASS-21, and PSQI. Baseline assessments were completed at the start of the season, while emotional symptoms and sleep quality were monitored monthly. Time-loss injuries were recorded throughout the season by the club's medical staff using standardized procedures. Analyses included descriptive statistics, between-group comparisons, and Poisson generalized linear mixed models. Overall, higher composite risk-index scores were associated with higher injury rates across follow-up periods. In male players, high-risk scores in stress control were associated with higher injury incidence than low- and moderate-risk scores. In female players, higher depressive symptom scores and higher global risk-index scores were associated with higher injury incidence; additionally, moderate-risk scores in evaluation influence were linked to increased injury incidence. These findings support the potential utility of a composite psychological risk index for identifying players with heightened psychological vulnerability and highlight the potential value of incorporating systematic psychological screening into injury-prevention programmes in high-performance football.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.