ArticleNPJ science of food2026
Leveraging large language models to maintain a branded food product database.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Branded food data are essential for assessing contemporary dietary behavior and the global food environment. However, processing such data is challenging due to its vast, rapidly changing nature, variable quality, and numerous sources. To address these limitations, we developed a fully automated, large language model (LLM)-powered pipeline for collecting, standardizing, and enriching branded food data, enabling ingredient-level analyses, and facilitating estimation of ingredient quantities and undeclared nutrient content. Evaluation of LLM performance demonstrated that a fine-tuned model outperformed the human experts in parsing and mapping product data. Non-fine-tuned LLMs showed insufficient performance, whereas even modest amounts of fine-tuning data substantially improved results. Overall, LLMs provide a scalable approach for processing branded food data and supporting more consistent and standardized data curation, with performance exceeding that of an individual human expert. These results highlight the potential of LLMs to transform the management and analysis of complex, large-scale food databases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.