ReviewGlobal change biology2026
The Integration of Fire Ecology and Freshwater Ecosystems in North America: Knowledge Gaps and Research Needs.
Review in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wildfires, unplanned fires that start and spread under the influence of weather and fuel composition, are increasing in frequency, duration, and severity across North America. While wildfires are one component of wildland fire, a broader natural process in many ecosystems, their changing behavior poses growing ecological and management challenges. Although wildfire is widely recognized as an important disturbance, empirical research quantifying its impacts on freshwater ecosystems remains limited and fragmented. As a result, our understanding of how wildfire affects imperiled freshwater systems remains underdeveloped. The objective of this review was to synthesize the existing empirical literature and identify key knowledge gaps to guide future research on wildfire-freshwater interactions across both biotic and abiotic components. At the biological scale, uncertainties remain around species- and community-level responses (e.g., direct and indirect effects on biota). Freshwater habitat dimensions should also be the focus of further research, including alterations to physical structure (e.g., vegetation) and physicochemical conditions (e.g., temperature). From a management perspective, critical questions relate to fire-informed restoration (e.g., specialized techniques, role of managed burns) and strategies for enhancing ecosystem resilience (e.g., identifying relevant indicators, links to watershed health). Understanding how land-use change (e.g., forestry) and climate change interact to influence wildfire regimes and generate cumulative effects across landscapes is also essential in this new wildfire reality. To advance research and practice, we recommend comprehensive monitoring, standardization of methods and indicators, recognition of the role of cultural and prescribed burns, meaningful knowledge co-production, and bridging the gap between scientific knowledge and management action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.