Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42303538›Full record

Trial reportClinical genitourinary cancer2026

Overall Survival of Patients With PSA-Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Analysis of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial of pTVG-HP DNA Vaccine Versus Placebo.

Douglas G McNeel, Jens C Eickhoff, Arianna Perez, Glenn Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01341652 (Randomized Phase II Trial of a DNA Vaccine Encoding Prostatic Acid Phosphatase), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01341652 phase2completednot on this map

Randomized Phase II Trial of a DNA Vaccine Encoding Prostatic Acid Phosphatase (pTVG-HP) Versus GM-CSF Adjuvant in Patients With Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2011 to 2020Enrolled99ConditionsProstate CancerArmspTVG-HP, rhGM-CSF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Douglas G McNeelUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. Electronic address: dm3@medicine.wisc.edu.
Jens C EickhoffUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Arianna PerezUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Glenn LiuUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Justine Yang Bruce · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
University of Wisconsin Prostate SPOREP50CA269011 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVID F. JARRARD, DOUGLAS G. MCNEEL · 2023 to 2026
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS P50 CA269011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe previously reported results from a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating a DNA vaccine (pTVG-HP) encoding prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) versus placebo (GM-CSF vaccine adjuvant alone) in patients with PSA-recurrent, nonmetastatic, noncastrate prostate cancer (NCT01341652). The primary endpoint of 2-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was not different between the treatment arms. This trial was reopened for long-term evaluation. METHODS AND

resultsThe median follow-up for long-term overall survival was 4.1 years (range 0.1-13.8+ years). Median overall survival of 48 patients treated with pTVG-HP was 13.4 years versus 8.6 years for 49 patients treated with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.90). Long-term follow-up information on survival and subsequent treatments was available for 59 patients treated at one site. Of these, 56 were treated with subsequent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). When analyzing overall survival for this cohort, the adjusted HR was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.36-1.00) when comparing pTVG-HP versus placebo, after adjusting for baseline characteristics and for ADT and subsequent treatment exposure. The median time to beginning ADT was 2.2 years for patients randomized to pTVG-HP versus 1.4 years for patients randomized to placebo. The median time to the next therapy for castration-resistant disease after beginning ADT was 4.7 years for patients randomized to pTVG-HP versus 2.1 years for patients randomized to placebo.

conclusionsThese results suggest that pTVG-HP may have had a single-agent benefit that could not be appreciated using an MFS endpoint. This is consistent with results from other trials of anticancer vaccines, which suggest that these may have more impact on longer-term endpoints such as survival.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsVaccines, DNAAcid PhosphataseAgedAged, 80 and overFollow-Up StudiesGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenTreatment OutcomeAcid PhosphataseCancer VaccinesGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorProstate-Specific Antigenprostatic acid phosphataseVaccines, DNAbiochemical recurrenceClinical trialGM-CSFProstatic acid phosphatasetumor vaccine

Identifiers

PMID42303538
PMCPMC13272971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.