Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42303462›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2026

A User-Centered Approach to Achieving High Degree of Digital Health Technology Utilization for Community HIV Case Management and Data Collection in Ethiopia.

Legese A Mekuria, Getaneh Likasa, Temesgan Sintayehu, Leul Mekonen, Asayehegn Tekeste, Endris Seid, Wondwossen Asefa, Afework Negash, Abiy Shewarega, Mesfin Tilaye and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Legese A MekuriaProject HOPE, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. legesealex@gmail.com.
Getaneh LikasaProject HOPE, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Temesgan SintayehuProject HOPE, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Leul MekonenProject HOPE, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Asayehegn TekesteProject HOPE, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Endris SeidProject HOPE, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Wondwossen AsefaProject HOPE, Washington, DC, USA.
Afework NegashPreviously with USAID, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abiy ShewaregaPreviously with USAID, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mesfin TilayePreviously with USAID, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gizachew EyassuU.S. Embassy, Foreign Assistance Section, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kidist BeleteU.S. Embassy, Foreign Assistance Section, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mohamed NurProject HOPE, Windhoek, Namibia.
Steven NeriProject HOPE, Windhoek, Namibia.
Adrienne HayesProject HOPE, Washington, DC, USA.
Emily LiddellProject HOPE, Washington, DC, USA.
Sangeeta MookherjiProject HOPE, Washington, DC, USA.
Dawit A TsegayeProject HOPE, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health technologies have untapped potential to transform community health systems, and they are underutilized for chronic HIV care and electronic data management in low- and middle-income countries. We describe the design, development, and use of a mobile health application in community-based HIV prevention, care, and treatment programs implemented in Ethiopia since 2017. Initially, these programs utilized aggregate data collection methods, which were fragmented, non-uniform, and largely paper-based, posing challenges to data quality and data use. Local software developers applied user-centered methods to build a Unified Data System (UDS), an innovative digital health solution aimed at standardizing case management and routine data collection procedures. Developers involved end-users, including frontline community health workers (CHWs) and program managers, in the design and development process. They also conducted field visits to understand and assess user activities and needs. Developers and program staff conducted field testing, and they made design changes iteratively to incorporate user feedback. Local implementing partners deployed 950 CHWs to use the UDS for HIV service delivery and client-level data collection offline. Data were stored centrally in the CommCare HQ web service backed by a local analytics server. The UDS was linked to Power BI for advanced data analytics and visualization. Data validation tests were performed prior to indicator computation and reporting to the next level. 1,766 mobile accounts were opened for CHWs, of which 1,628 (92.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]=90.8%, 93.4%) have submitted data. An additional 368 of 392 web accounts (93.9%; 95% CI=91.0%, 96.0%) have been used by program managers and monitoring and evaluation experts to access the dashboard. The UDS has eliminated the tedious, manual, paper-based work associated with data (dis)aggregation and reporting by frontline CHWs and local implementing partners. Hence, the number of days to access client-level data by the local partners was reduced from 1 month to just 1 day, and the time to report on activity performance was shortened from 5 days to a half-day. Data completeness was nearly 100% and data validation tests demonstrated no invalid data elements or errors. Generally, there was a high degree of digital health technology utilization by frontline CHWs and local implementing partners for standardized HIV care, high-quality data collection, and making data-informed decisions. Lessons learned from the UDS implementation could be adapted not only to support community HIV programming but also to strengthen national electronic community health information systems.

Indexed as

Case ManagementCommunity Health ServicesData CollectionHIV InfectionsMobile ApplicationsCommunity Health WorkersDigital HealthEthiopiaHumans

Identifiers

PMID42303462
PMCPMC13455844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.