ArticleBMJ open2026
What is the feasibility and acceptability of stool sampling and testing for childhood tuberculosis diagnosis? A qualitative study in The Gambia.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the feasibility and acceptability of stool sampling and testing for childhood tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis among adolescents, child caregivers and healthcare workers (HCWs) who participated in a diagnostic accuracy study and among National Leprosy and TB Control Programme (NLTP) officials in The Gambia.
designThis was a qualitative cross-sectional study that used semi-structured interviews. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework guided our analysis.
settingThe study was conducted in The Gambia at the TB clinic of the Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
participantsWe purposively sampled and interviewed 27 participants, including adolescents and caregivers of children who participated in and provided stool samples for the diagnostic accuracy study of the Childhood TB Research in West Africa (CHIRWA-2), HCWs involved in the CHIRWA-2 study, and NLTP officials responsible for policy and programme implementation in The Gambia.
resultsHCWs and NLTP officials described stool sampling and testing as feasible for TB diagnosis, given the ease of collection and the potential to integrate them into existing workflows. However, availability and sustainable supply of resources are required for successful implementation. Caregivers were willing to provide stool samples for TB diagnosis, although they were surprised by the use of stool for diagnosing TB. Adolescents, on the other hand, felt embarrassed about providing a stool sample. HCWs preferred stool samples over sputum samples because stool sampling was easier and less time-consuming, and further suggested sustained logistics support, adequate community sensitisation and regular incentives for HCWs as necessary for successful implementation.
conclusionParticipants perceived that using stool sampling and testing for TB diagnosis in children is feasible and acceptable in Gambia. Its integration into routine health service delivery requires careful consideration of the available resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.