Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42303251›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2026

Patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment : a qualitative investigation.

Paul Leighton, Maria Armaou, Catherine Arundel, Puvan Tharmanathan, Joseph Dias, DISC Trial Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul LeightonFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Nottingham, UK.
Maria ArmaouFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Nottingham, UK.
Catherine ArundelDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Puvan TharmanathanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9196-0207
Joseph DiasAcademic Team of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
DISC Trial Investigators

Funding

National Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Our aim was to investigate patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment. Methods: A purposive sample of 45 participants enrolled in the Dupuytren's Interventions Surgery vs Collagenase (DISC) trial. Participants were interviewed three to six months after treatment. Interviews were semistructured and analyzed using an inductive, thematic approach, with data collection and analysis integrated iteratively. Results: Participants reported living for extended periods with contracture and seeking medical advice only when they had trouble doing practical tasks or when self-conscious about their appearance. Most participants reported improvement irrespective of treatment modality. Some participants who were treated with collagenase noted that while the outcome was not perfect, it was acceptable. More participants who were treated with collagenase reported preferring collagenase in the future, compared with the proportion preferring further surgery. Conclusion: This research contributes to our knowledge of how treatments for Dupuytren's contracture are understood and experienced. It demonstrates that treatment experience is important to patients, and that they are often willing to accept a compromise in outcome for an easier treatment experience. Patients may be willing to accept multiple, repeated treatments. As a result, non-surgical or noninvasive treatment options, such as collagenase, are likely to be popular and could reduce delay in seeking treatment.

Identifiers

PMID42303251
PMCPMC13271826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.