ArticleBone & joint open2026
Patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment : a qualitative investigation.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Our aim was to investigate patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment. Methods: A purposive sample of 45 participants enrolled in the Dupuytren's Interventions Surgery vs Collagenase (DISC) trial. Participants were interviewed three to six months after treatment. Interviews were semistructured and analyzed using an inductive, thematic approach, with data collection and analysis integrated iteratively. Results: Participants reported living for extended periods with contracture and seeking medical advice only when they had trouble doing practical tasks or when self-conscious about their appearance. Most participants reported improvement irrespective of treatment modality. Some participants who were treated with collagenase noted that while the outcome was not perfect, it was acceptable. More participants who were treated with collagenase reported preferring collagenase in the future, compared with the proportion preferring further surgery. Conclusion: This research contributes to our knowledge of how treatments for Dupuytren's contracture are understood and experienced. It demonstrates that treatment experience is important to patients, and that they are often willing to accept a compromise in outcome for an easier treatment experience. Patients may be willing to accept multiple, repeated treatments. As a result, non-surgical or noninvasive treatment options, such as collagenase, are likely to be popular and could reduce delay in seeking treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.