ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026
Experts' Opinions on the Sustainable Use of Digital Health Tools for Effective Future Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Questionnaire Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the potential role of digital health tools in enhancing pandemic preparedness and response. These tools became essential, supporting not only health care delivery but also decision-making, communication, case identification, contact tracing, surveillance, vaccination rollout, and intervention evaluation. The interest in applying digital health tools to pandemic preparedness and response motivated conversations about digital epidemiology-a field of study that aims to provide insight into health and disease determinants by leveraging diverse digital data sources. In a globalized world, effective preparedness and response to pandemics require coordinated global action.
objectiveThis study investigates experts' opinions on strategies for improving global health security through the effective use of digital epidemiology, considering the current landscape of digital determinants of health.
methodsEpidemiologists, public health specialists, data scientists, and professionals with expertise in various components of digital health were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling methods. Their opinions were elicited using an electronic questionnaire developed by the authors in Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap; Vanderbilt University). To ensure a global perspective, participants were recruited from Africa, North America, Oceania, and Europe. Thematic analysis and the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis framework were used to analyze participants' responses.
resultsMost participants were familiar with the concept of digital epidemiology and expressed positive sentiments about its potential in strengthening global health security. Privacy and security, along with ethical and legal considerations, were ranked by most experts as high priority areas that decision-makers and implementers must consider to ensure sustainable integration of digital epidemiology tools in future pandemic preparedness and response. A SWOT analysis of participants' views on the promise of digital epidemiology revealed fewer strengths and more weaknesses compared to other components of the analysis framework.
conclusionsThis study highlights the growing recognition of digital epidemiology as a critical tool for enhancing global health security, particularly using nontraditional data sources and emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence. The study affirms the need for a globally coordinated approach to governance, regulation, and investment in digital health infrastructure to ensure the responsible and effective application of digital innovations in epidemiological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.