Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42303240›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026

Hummingbird and Hawkmoth Wing Shape: Analyzing Functional Convergence in Analogous Structures.

Benton Walters, Yuming Liu, Iman Fadel, Humberto G Ferrón, Emily J Rayfield, Philip C J Donoghue

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benton WaltersBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-4867-9335
Yuming LiuBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Iman FadelBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Humberto G FerrónCavanilles Institute Biodiversity and Evolut. Biol. (ICBBE), Universitat De València, Valencia 46980, Spain.
Emily J RayfieldBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Philip C J DonoghueBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3116-7463

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W00867X/1 E.J.R.John Templeton Foundation JTF62574Leverhulme Trust RF-2022-167 P.C.J.D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Similar wing planform shapes have independently evolved in both hummingbirds and hawkmoths, indicating convergence. Functional analysis of bird wings has shown that the rigours of flight are a constraining influence on shape, resulting in evolution toward better functioning forms. Shape similarity in these analogous structures may therefore represent convergence upon a more functionally adapted morphology. Using a theoretical morphospace, we test the performance of hummingbird and hummingbird-mimicking moth wings and compare with birds and a dataset of other insect groups. When compared with other birds, hummingbirds demonstrate a strong functional constraint, though this effect is absent when compared with insects that more closely match their flight mode. The phylogenetic signal of hummingbird wing shape is minimal, though this result is likely clouded by variation introduced by sexual dimorphism. Evidence of functional constraint in the sampled planforms is small and varies according to taxa, with Macroglossum moths exhibiting the least constraint. This suggests that morphological convergence between hawkmoths and hummingbirds may result from selective pressures external to the functional constraints of flight.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBirdsFlight, AnimalMelopsittacusWings, AnimalAnimalsFemalePhylogenySpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID42303240
PMCPMC13401046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.