Trial reportBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
The effect of spreader graft use on voice in rhinoplasty cases: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of spreader graft placement during cosmetic rhinoplasty on both objective acoustic measures and subjective voice quality.
methodsIn this prospective, double-blind, controlled study, volunteers who underwent open structural rhinoplasty by the same surgeon between September 2022 and January 2025 were included. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A (with spreader grafts) and Group B (without spreader grafts). Voice recordings were obtained preoperatively and three months postoperatively in a dedicated voice and speech laboratory. All participants provided informed consent and completed the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) before and after surgery. Objective voice analysis was conducted using the Computerized Speech Lab (CSL) system and Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) software (Kay Elemetrics Corp., Lincoln Park, NJ, USA). Acoustic parameters ‒ fundamental frequency (f0), jitter, jitter percentage, shimmer, shimmer percentage, and Noise-to-Harmonics Ratio (NHR) ‒ were measured from sustained /a/ phonations. Spectrographic analysis assessed formant frequencies (F1-F4) during production of nasal consonants (/m/, /n/) and the nasalized vowel /i/ in the word mini.
resultsIn Group A, significant postoperative differences were observed only in F3 and F4 formant values for /m/. In Group B, significant changes were detected in shimmer (dB), jitter, and formant values (F2, F3, F4 for /n/ and F3, F4 for /m/). Postoperative group comparison revealed significant differences in F4 for /m/, F3 for /n/, and F3 for the nasalized vowel /i/. Regarding subjective measures, VHI-10 scores significantly increased postoperatively only in Group B. Preoperative VHI-10 scores did not differ significantly between groups, while postoperative scores showed significant differences.
conclusionCosmetic rhinoplasty may affect voice parameters, particularly formants F3 and F4, essential components of the singer's and actor's formant cluster. Spreader grafts appear to preserve these frequencies, suggesting their importance in patients who professionally rely on voice quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: According to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence, this study qualifies as Level 1b evidence, as it is a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.