Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42302310›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2026

Non clinic-Based Interventions to Mitigate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Scoping Review.

Yasmeen Abu Fraiha, James Devanney, Megan McNichol, Thomas Cummiskey, Abirami Kumaresan, Somnath Bose

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasmeen Abu FraihaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-3326-397
James DevanneyDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Megan McNicholDepartment of Information Technology, Division of Knowledge Services, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Cambridge, MA.
Thomas CummiskeyDepartment of Information Technology, Division of Knowledge Services, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Cambridge, MA.
Abirami KumaresanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Somnath BoseDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSurvivors of critical illness and their caregivers often experience a complex constellation of sequelae in the aftermath of their recovery, termed post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and PICS-Family (PICS-F), respectively. These can have a dire impact on patients and families, and thus require coordinated rehabilitative efforts. However, optimal modes of providing support services remain unclear, with traditional clinic-based strategies showing mixed results. This scoping review aimed to summarize the feasibility and effectiveness of nonclinic-based follow-up and rehabilitation strategies for adult survivors of critical illness and their caregivers. DATA SOURCES: Databases were searched on July 8, 2025, and included Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting interventions and follow-up options for adult survivors of critical illness requiring ICU stay and targeting PICS and PICS-F were included. Studies examining interventions in the outpatient clinic or ICU settings exclusively were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Two team members used Covidence to screen all the deduplicated citations, with a third team member acting as a tiebreaker. The studies included were reviewed in full to extract general data, the studied syndrome (PICS, PICS-F, or both), component of PICS studied, study population, study objectives, methods, inclusion and exclusion criteria, intervention details, general results, and study conclusions. DATA SYNTHESIS: We screened 8608 studies; 45 studies met criteria and were included in this review. Most (64%) focused on the physical and psychological sequelae of PICS. Interventions varied widely, by setting, duration, and approach. Outcome measures were heterogeneous, limiting comparisons. Most studies evaluated the feasibility of interventions and not effectiveness. Only six articles targeted PICS-F exclusively.

conclusionsThis scoping review summarizes the status of different nonclinic-based follow-up and rehabilitation strategies for adult ICU survivors. Future research focused on studies that evaluate effectiveness of these strategies in mitigating the burden of PICS and PICS-F, especially within the cognitive domain, is likely to improve aftercare for both patients and their families.

Indexed as

CaregiversCritical CareCritical IllnessSurvivorsHumansIntensive Care Unitsintensive care unit follow-up careintensive care unit survivorspost-intensive care unit syndromerehabilitation after critical illness

Identifiers

PMID42302310
PMCPMC13275156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.