ReviewJMIR AI2026
Application of Language Models for the Analysis of Adverse Drug Events in Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Scoping Review.
Review in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Clinical Trial Operations: A Narrative Review and Site-Level Governance Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse drug events (ADEs) remain a critical safety issue in pharmaceutical research and development (Pharma R&D), necessitating robust methods for early detection and surveillance. Language models (LMs) are increasingly used in ADE analysis, addressing safety challenges during drug development and postmarket surveillance. Language modeling approaches, ranging from static embeddings to large language models (LLMs), capitalize on diverse data sources, such as clinical trial datasets, electronic health records, and social media posts, to predict ADEs, analyze real-world evidence, and improve drug screening and pharmacovigilance systems. Objective: This scoping review aims to map the application of LMs for the analysis of ADEs across the Pharma R&D lifecycle. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant papers published between January 2015 and October 2025. Results: This review identified 49 relevant papers. Overall, LM applications in Pharma R&D safety analysis are concentrated in 2 distinct phases: ADE prediction during the premarket phase (n=16) and ADE detection in postmarket surveillance (n=33). Conclusions: While some models demonstrate high predictive performance, persistent challenges, including data heterogeneity and limited external validation, hinder widespread adoption. Despite these barriers, discriminative and generative LMs have the potential to transform drug safety across the pre- and postapproval phases, especially when integrated with real-world pharmacovigilance frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.