Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42302293›Full record

Observational studyJMIR aging2026

Predicting Frailty Trajectories Using Interpretable Machine Learning Among Older Adults Following Hip Surgery: Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Jingying Huang, Qinqin Fan, Huiqin Shi, Jiaojiao Chen, Hongbo Gao, Kailai Gu, Jin Yang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingying HuangSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, No. 3, Qingchun East Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 86 17757173794.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7536-9978
Qinqin FanShanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4685-3482
Huiqin ShiZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1661-862X
Jiaojiao ChenSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, No. 3, Qingchun East Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 86 17757173794.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6038-3703
Hongbo GaoShanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7888-4673
Kailai GuZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8110-6154
Jin YangSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, No. 3, Qingchun East Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 86 17757173794.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5890-4385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative frailty is highly prevalent among older adults undergoing hip surgery and is closely linked to poor clinical outcomes. Despite growing interest in understanding its progression, the temporal patterns of frailty remain underexplored. Moreover, there is a lack of validated models that can predict frailty trajectories and stratify patients by risk in the early postoperative period. Objective: This study aimed to identify distinct frailty trajectories within 6 months following hip surgery in older adults and to explore their associated predictors. An interpretable machine-learning model was developed and internally validated for individualized risk prediction and was implemented as a clinically accessible web-based calculator. Methods: This prospective longitudinal observational study was conducted among older adults undergoing hip surgery at a tertiary hospital in China. Frailty assessments were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. A total of 209 participants who completed the 6-month follow-up were included in the analysis. Frailty was assessed using the Frailty Index, and group-based trajectory modeling was applied to identify distinct frailty progression patterns. Predictive variables were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. An interpretable Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed using a 60:40 training-test data split. Model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Interpretability was assessed using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) at both the global and individual levels. Results: Three distinct frailty trajectories were identified: low-fluctuation frailty (55/209, 26%), high-improvement frailty (81/209, 39%), and high-deterioration frailty (73/209, 35%). Twelve predictors grounded in the Health Ecology Model were selected, spanning individual characteristics, interpersonal networks, and the living environment. The XGBoost model demonstrated excellent discrimination, with a microaverage area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99) in the training set and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.96) in the test set. Calibration was acceptable, with a weighted Brier score of 0.0852. Decision curve analysis showed favorable clinical utility across a range of threshold probabilities. A web-based risk calculator was developed to facilitate personalized frailty trajectory prediction. Conclusions: The XGBoost model demonstrated strong predictive performance and interpretability, enabling the early identification of older patients at risk for adverse frailty trajectories following hip surgery. This tool may support targeted interventions and improve perioperative care in geriatric populations.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipFrailtyMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsChinaFemaleFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePrediction AlgorithmsProspective StudiesagingExtreme Gradient Boostingfrailtyfrailty trajectoryhip surgeryolder adultspredictive modelSHAP analysisShapley Additive ExplanationsXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42302293
PMCPMC13271583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.