ArticlePlant physiology2026
Phytochrome-interacting factors integrate environmental signals to regulate tomato growth and development.
Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Redundant in the light, indifferent to the heat: the role of the PIF family in mature tomato.Plant physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants respond to environmental cues, such as light and temperature, which regulate their growth and development. In the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORS (PIFs) are central regulators of both shade avoidance and thermomorphogenesis. However, their functional roles in crop species are less well known. Here, we generated a tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) mutant lacking all 8 known PIF genes (slpifo), to investigate their roles under controlled and field conditions. We showed that SlPIFs are essential for shade responses, while thermomorphogenesis-induced elongation is largely independent of SlPIFs, revealing species-specific differences in regulatory mechanisms. Under low-red to far-red light (low R/FR), slpifo plants failed to exhibit characteristic wild-type responses, including shoot elongation, expansion and thinning of leaf blades, and depletion of leaf chlorophyll. We further identified redundant roles for SlPIF1a, SlPIF4, and SlPIF8a in regulating stem elongation and chlorophyll depletion in response to low R/FR. In addition, slpifo plants exhibited reduced overall growth, fruit size, fruit number, and seed dormancy under field conditions, highlighting broader roles for SlPIFs beyond neighbor detection. These findings provide insights into how PIFs orchestrate organ-specific developmental plasticity in tomato, offering avenues to optimize light responsiveness for crop improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.