Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42302156›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2026

Prenatal Exposure to Different Nitrogen Supplementation Strategies in Beef Cows Enhances Foetal Growth and Induces Transcriptional Adaptations in Offspring Skeletal Muscle.

Luana Ruiz Dos Santos, Karolina Batista Nascimento, Gustavo Dias Guimarães, Gabriel de Oliveira Damásio, Richardson Antonio Carvalho de Torres, Igor Gomes Fávero, Lucas Peralta Carneiro Borges, Isabella de Oliveira, Javier Andrés Moreno Meneses, Nick Vergara Lopes Serão and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Luana Ruiz Dos SantosDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Karolina Batista NascimentoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gustavo Dias GuimarãesDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gabriel de Oliveira DamásioDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Richardson Antonio Carvalho de TorresDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Igor Gomes FáveroDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lucas Peralta Carneiro BorgesDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Isabella de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Javier Andrés Moreno MenesesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales, Cartagena, Bolivar, Colombia.
Nick Vergara Lopes SerãoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tathyane Ramalho Santos GionbelliDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-2848
Daniel Rume CasagrandeDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0732-6196
Marcio Souza de DuarteDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Mateus Pies GionbelliDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311660/2023-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 405167/2024-5; Cargill Animal NutritionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-04074-25Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-04181-22Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais BPD-00215-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effects of different nitrogen supplementation strategies during mid-gestation on postnatal performance, skeletal muscle gene expression and morphology and nutritional and metabolic parameters of beef offspring during both the cow-calf and backgrounding phases. Thirty Zebu cows (532 ± 11 kg of body weight [BW]) were used. The following treatments were randomly assigned to cows from 127 ± 17 to 227 ± 17 days of gestation: (1) Control (CON; n = 10): basal diet (corn silage + sugarcane bagasse) and a mineral supplement with urea (60 g/100 kg BW); (2) Rumen-degradable protein (RDP; n = 10): basal diet plus a commercial protein supplement (250 g/100 kg BW) and ground corn (44 g/100 kg BW); and (3) Rumen-undegradable protein (RUP; n = 10): basal diet plus protected soybean meal (3.5 g/kg BW) and a mineral supplement with urea (60 g/100 kg BW). After supplementation, cows were managed as a single group on pasture. Offspring were evaluated during the cow-calf phase, and in a 60-day feedlot backgrounding phase. At the end of the supplementation period (227 days of gestation), cows in the RUP treatment had greater BW compared to those in the CON and RDP treatments (p = 0.01). Near parturition (282 days of gestation), no differences in BW were observed among treatments (p = 0.28). Birth weight was greater in the RUP group compared to the CON and RDP groups (p = 0.04), with no differences between the CON and RDP. No effects of treatment were observed on offspring weaning weight, average daily gain, ultrasound carcass traits, nutrient intake, apparent total tract digestibility, ingestive behaviour or muscle fibre number and histomorphometry (p > 0.05). At 346 ± 31 days of age, RUP offspring exhibited increased expression of skeletal muscle genes, including ACACA, FASN, PPARG, CPT2, IGF1R and COL3A1 compared to the CON group (p ≤ 0.05). Additionally, RUP offspring showed greater expression of ACACA, FABP4, PPARA, SCD1, COL3A1 and IGFR1 compared to RDP offspring (p ≤ 0.04). In conclusion, maternal supplementation with rumen-protected protein during mid-gestation enhances foetal growth and induces beneficial transcriptional adaptations in skeletal muscle compared to non-protein or RDP supplementation strategies, without affecting postnatal growth performance.

Indexed as

Fetal DevelopmentMuscle, SkeletalNitrogenAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietDietary SupplementsFemalePregnancyNitrogenargininefoetal programmingrumen‐degradable proteinrumen‐undegradable proteinskeletal muscle developmentZebu cattle

Identifiers

PMID42302156
PMCPMC13576567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.