ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026
Producing Mobility, Withholding Authority: Epistemic Drain and Nursing Sovereignty in Nepal.
Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global discussions of nursing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are dominated by the language of shortage, staffing, retention, and migration. Although useful, this technocratic vocabulary obscures a deeper philosophical crisis: nurses may be numerically produced yet institutionally denied authority over knowledge, care, and professional futures. Using Nepal as a theory-generating case, this conceptual article employs critical interpretive synthesis and philosophical analysis of nursing, policy, migration, and interdisciplinary scholarship to argue that the central problem is not workforce scarcity alone but a crisis of 'nursing sovereignty'. The paper introduces three concepts. First, epistemic drain extends the idea of brain drain by naming the erosion of mentorship, pedagogical continuity, professional memory, policy voice, research capacity, and the public credibility of nursing knowledge. Second, professionalised for exit captures a paradox of production in which nursing education expands global mobility more readily than local authority, making migration a morally justified reaction to constrained socioeconomic prospects, rather than a lack of professional dedication. Third, nursing sovereignty names the collective capacity of nurses to shape the ends, authority, knowledge, and institutional conditions of their profession. Drawing together social epistemology, feminist ethics, decolonial lens, political economy, sociology of professions, spatial theory, and digital pedagogy, the article argues that Nepal illuminates a wider LMIC condition in which nurses are essential yet disposable, mobile yet institutionally voiceless, and professionalised yet epistemically diminished. It concludes with a six-domain normative framework for institutional redesign: epistemic authority, educational integrity, governance voice, material justice, spatial and digital parity, and mobility justice. Reframing nursing in this way shifts debate from retention to justice, from labour supply to institutional re-design, and from workforce management to the political philosophy underpinning nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.