Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42302088›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A two stage statistical framework for cold start spare part demand forecasting.

Sendhil Nathan B, Veera Siva Reddy B, Chandrasekhara Sastry C, Sachin Salunkhe, Robert Cep, Santi Jitpichitchai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sendhil Nathan BDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (MED), Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kurnool (IIITDM Kurnool), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Veera Siva Reddy BDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (MED), Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kurnool (IIITDM Kurnool), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9169-6630
Chandrasekhara Sastry CDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (MED), Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kurnool (IIITDM Kurnool), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sachin SalunkheDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Robert CepDepartment of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Santi JitpichitchaiFord Sales Services (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate demand forecasting for spare parts under true cold-start conditions remains a fundamental challenge due to extreme demand sparsity, zero inflation, and the complete absence of historical demand information. Conventional time-series methods, single-stage machine learning models, and sequence-based probabilistic forecasters are inherently ill-suited to this setting, as they either rely on historical observations or fail to properly represent zero-demand events and distributional uncertainty. To address this gap, this study proposes a novel Zero-Inflated Gamma Monte Carlo (ZIG MC) framework that explicitly decomposes demand into occurrence and magnitude components and generates fully probabilistic forecasts suitable for risk-aware inventory decision-making. The proposed approach integrates a Bernoulli classifier for demand occurrence with a Gamma-based magnitude model and employs Monte Carlo simulation to construct predictive demand distributions. Model performance is evaluated using a strict part-level nested cold-start validation protocol on an industrial transactional dataset, ensuring genuine generalization to previously unseen parts. Results demonstrate that ZIG MC consistently outperforms strong single-stage regressors, statistical hurdle models, and a state-of-the-art probabilistic deep learning benchmark (DeepAR). The proposed framework achieves the lowest point forecast error (MAE = 5.65), representing a 6.4% improvement over the strongest single-stage baseline, while also delivering superior scale-independent accuracy (MASE = 0.87). Probabilistic evaluation using the Continuous Ranked Probability Score shows an order-of-magnitude improvement over DeepAR (CRPS = 3.27 vs. 15.41), indicating substantially better calibration and sharper predictive distributions under cold-start conditions. Quantile-based reliability analysis confirms that predicted service-level quantiles are well aligned with empirical outcomes, enabling reliable translation of forecasts into inventory policies. Statistical significance testing further confirms that the observed performance gains are robust and not attributable to random variation. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that forecasting performance is stable with respect to distributional assumptions and Monte Carlo sampling size. Inventory simulations reveal that ZIG MC yields higher fill rates and lower stock-out risk than competing probabilistic models at comparable inventory levels, directly linking improved probabilistic calibration to operational benefits. Collectively, these findings establish ZIG MC as a robust and practical framework for cold-start forecasting of intermittent demand, offering a principled foundation for uncertainty-aware inventory planning in data-scarce environments.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalForecastingMonte Carlo MethodPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Models

Identifiers

PMID42302088
PMCPMC13271490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.