ArticlePloS one2026
Diagnostic performance of discriminant formulas and machine learning models for detecting β-thalassemia trait in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundβ-thalassemia poses a considerable public health burden in Bangladesh, where a high carrier frequency underlies widespread disease risk. It is necessary to distinguish β-thalassemia trait (βTT) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) to ensure genetic counseling and enable effective prevention strategies. Despite the availability of various discriminant formulas and machine learning algorithms (MLAs), their comparative diagnostic performance within the Bangladeshi population has not been comprehensively investigated. This study aimed to assess different discriminant formulas and ML models as well as to propose novel combinations of formulas for population-specific screening of βTT.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we compared 47 discriminant formulas and 12 machine learning models to distinguish β-thalassemia trait from iron-deficiency anemia in 467 individuals (143 βTT, 324 anemia) drawn from a 2,514-participant cohort. DF-6 and DF-27 were two new formulas constructed by integrating high-performing formulas. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and SECA (Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives), provided the final ranking for performance. Cluster analysis was performed to identify groups with similar diagnostic performance.
resultsPopulation-specific optimal cut-off values were determined for the discriminant formulas. The newly proposed formulas, DF-6 and DF-27, ranked among the top ten performers alongside RBC, Janel (11T), Ravanbakhsh-F1, Srivastav, Alparslan, Hisham, Index 26, and Kerman I. DF-6 (AUC: 0.9707) achieved the best overall performance across the diagnostic metrics. DF-6 achieved the best overall performance (AUC: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, p < 0.0001). Assessment of ML models revealed that XGBoost (XGB) (AUC: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, p < 0.0001) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (AUC: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99, p < 0.0001) provided the highest diagnostic accuracy. The reliability of ensemble ML models was confirmed by MCDM and cluster analyses.
conclusionsThe combination of novel discriminant formula DF-6 and integration of XGB and SVM ML models can substantially strengthen nationwide screening programs to reduce the burden of thalassemia in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.