ArticlePloS one2026
The evolution of life size Barbie and Ken: Are they any closer to reality?
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barbie and Ken dolls have been criticized over time for their overt misalignment of body shape in comparison with the average adult, and the possibility that this impacts the formative minds of children, particularly girls. Updating a previous examination of the original Barbie and Ken dolls from 1996, this study compared the body measures of the 2016 "Fashionista" range-including Curvy, Petite, Tall, and Standard Barbie models, and new Malibu Ken-with representative population data of young adult females and males using anthropometric techniques. A range of anthropometric girth measures plus height were taken from each doll, and body proportions were calculated. The rules of allometry were used to scale the dolls to a standardized adult height of 170.18 cm to determine the dimensions the dolls at this adjusted size. The dimensions were then compared to the same height-adjusted reference population norms used in the original study. The comparison revealed significant alterations in the dolls' morphology compared with the original Barbie and Ken, with key measures of waist-to-hip and chest-to-waist ratios becoming more realistic and falling within the 95% confidence range of the population. According to z-score deviation data, Curvy Barbie fell closest to the mean for most of the scaled girth measures, while new Ken was closer to the mean for all girths except ankle. Design changes reflect a shift toward greater body diversity, with potential benefits for children's health behaviours through the production of a broader range of more diverse, human-like dolls. Importantly, key measurements and body proportions were generally closer to the respective reference populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.