ArticlePloS one2026
Machine learning approaches for predicting preventive maintenance costs of expressways in Xinjiang.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the expansion of high-speed road mileage and the aging of road networks, maintenance workloads have increased dramatically. Accurately forecasting preventive maintenance costs is a practical approach to rationally control maintenance expenditure, enhance capital utilization efficiency, and ensure the long-term stable operation of the road network. However, the current predictive model for preventive maintenance costs fails to adequately account for variations in types of preventive maintenance measures, limiting their ability to capture the actual cost variation patterns under different engineering conditions. Consequently, there remains scope for improvement in prediction accuracy. In this study, we developed three meta-heuristic-optimized hybrid models, each tailored to a specific asphalt pavement preventive maintenance measure: 1) the fruit fly optimization algorithm (FOA)-enhanced XGBoost model for crack filling; 2) the hiking optimization algorithm (HOA)-enhanced RF model for surface sealing; 3) the particle swarm optimization (PSO)-enhanced BPNN model for overlay. A case study demonstrates that FOA-XGBoost (R² = 0.8622, MAE = 0.0552) improved XGBoost's R² by 0.0526. In contrast, HOA-RF (MSE = 0.0032, RMSE = 0.0565) outperformed RF with lower error metrics. Furthermore, PSO-BPNN achieved the highest R² (0.9277) and the lowest MAE (0.0419) compared to BPNN. All models maintained MAPE below 5%. To further support the reliability of the results, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to assess the statistical significance of model performance differences. In addition, nested cross-validation and sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness and stability of the proposed models. These findings indicate that the optimized hybrid model has demonstrated improvements in both predictive accuracy and stability. Consequently, the developed models may provide useful support for maintenance cost estimation and resource allocation in expressway maintenance management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.