Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42302041›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Markov modeling in R: Advanced method using a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Jean Martial Kouame, Christian Kouakou, Soualio Gnanou, Bilé Yacouba, Carole Siani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jean Martial KouameDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-7221
Christian KouakouUniversité de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2077-165X
Soualio GnanouDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Bilé YacoubaDepartement of Operations and Decision Systems, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Carole SianiFaculté de Pharmacie, Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM UMR 1252, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0240-3618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Markov model is the kind of state transition model most widely used in Health Economic Evaluation (HEE) to analyse the efficiency of an intervention and support decision-making. However, it is has transition probabilities which remain constant over time, which limits its use for chronic diseases. Thus, to allow transition probabilities, rewards, or both, to vary over time, we use two types of methods: The first is "Implementing Time Dependency into Markov Transition Probabilities", which allows probabilities to vary over time as measured from the start of the simulation. The second is "Relaxing the Markov Assumption", by adding additional health states to the model, called tunnel states. In this tutorial, a case study on breast cancer is used to illustrate how to implement time dependence in a Markov model and how to conduct analyses of cost-effectiveness, probabilistic sensitivity, and the value of perfect information analyses with R.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisMarkov ChainsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansProbability

Identifiers

PMID42302041
PMCPMC13271473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.