Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42302019›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Student-teacher agreement on personality traits and social competencies during early adolescence: A longitudinal study.

Marek Blatný, Veronika Koutná, Martin Jelínek, Petr Květon, Alexander T Vazsonyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marek BlatnýDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Veronika KoutnáDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin JelínekDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr KvětonDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Alexander T VazsonyiDepartment of Family Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-1705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study sought to validate existing knowledge on inter-rater agreement on personality traits and social competencies. Based on longitudinal data, the study aimed to determine whether the agreement between student and teacher reports changes over time. The research sample consisted of a total of 296 early adolescents (181 females, 115 males, average age in the first wave of the two-year study period was 12.37 years). The personality traits and social competencies of students were rated by class teachers (N = 28, 75% females). Personality traits were measured by the Big Five Inventory and social competencies by the Social Skills Improvement System. The main findings of the study are as follows: 1) the highest agreement between student and teacher ratings of personality traits and social competencies was found for characteristics that were high in observability; 2) there was greater agreement between student and teacher ratings of social competencies for girls; 3) high temporal stability was found for personality traits and social competencies for both students and teachers; there were no substantial changes in the agreement of student and teacher ratings over time. Attention to hidden or difficult-to-assess student characteristics may prevent developmental, school, and social/interpersonal problems in adolescents.

Indexed as

PersonalitySchool TeachersSocial SkillsStudentsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMale

Identifiers

PMID42302019
PMCPMC13271505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.