ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Tobacco industry interference with the point-of-sale advertising, promotion, and sponsorship ban near educational facilities in Armenia.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tobacco control without cessation? Policy gaps in cessation services in Bangladesh.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following the introduction of comprehensive bans on tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship (TAPS), little is known about how the tobacco industry (TI) adapts its marketing strategies in low- and middle-income countries at point of sale (POS). This study examined post-ban TI marketing practices in Armenia after the 2022 comprehensive TAPS and display ban, focusing on youth exposure. We conducted a qualitative study using structured observations at 132 POS near educational facilities in Yerevan (capital city) and the Kotayk region, in-depth interviews with store owners/workers (n = 8), and focus group discussions with youth aged 15-20 (n = 28). Thematic analysis was applied with triangulation across data sources. Despite the ban, tobacco products remained widely available and visible near educational facilities. Cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products were prominently displayed using power walls, illuminated fixtures, and placement near youth-appealing items. Advertising persisted through covert, legally ambiguous tactics such as illuminated displays, integrated signage, colour schemes, flavours, and loyalty-based promotions, coupled with misleading messages, often not recognized as advertising by youth or retailers. Retailer incentive schemes, such as financial rewards, gifts, and staff engagement, were used to secure product prominence and drive sales. Youth access restrictions were weakly enforced, with poor visibility of age-of-sale signage, inconsistent ID checks, and reports of informal access routes. Comprehensive TAPS and POS display bans alone are insufficient to eliminate youth exposure to tobacco marketing. Stronger enforcement, regulation of indirect and retailer-focused marketing, and sustained monitoring of POS environments are essential to protect youth from ongoing TI influence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.