ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026
Diffractive wavefront correction for Fe L-edge spectroscopy on the meV scale.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a wavelength-dispersive instrument for high-resolution soft X-ray spectroscopy at large-scale facilities like synchrotron radiation sources or free-electron lasers. Demonstrated by simulations at the Fe L-edge in the range from 700 eV to 730 eV, an energy resolution of (12-15) meV is enabled by a wavefront-corrected reflection zone plate (RZP) with an aperture of 40 mm × 190 mm on a spherical Si substrate (radius 69 m). Its tangential slope error and deformation are measured on-axis along the RZP to ±0.1 arcsec (r.m.s.) and ±6.1 nm (r.m.s.), respectively, and simulated at off-axis positions of the substrate with a similar amplitude. The surface waviness is compensated around the design energy of 715 eV by a two-dimensional, adapted grating groove distribution. As a benefit, the diffracted beam is collimated to a one-dimensional focal line whose length of 40 mm nearly equals the sagittal detector size (50 mm): no photons in the +1st diffraction order with an efficiency of 6.4% are lost, and the acceptance solid angle of 16 mrad × 3.3 mrad provides a high transmission of the signal from the source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.