Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42301682›Full record

ArticleJournal of postgraduate medicine2026

From clinic to microscope: A study of clinicopathological concordance in 5000 skin biopsies from a tertiary care center.

S Singh, A Thirumalaiswamy, V Kharkar, S Mahajan, R Joshi, S M Sharath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of postgraduate medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S SinghDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, GSMC and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
A ThirumalaiswamyDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, GSMC and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
V KharkarDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, GSMC and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
S MahajanDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, GSMC and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
R JoshiDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
S M SharathDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, GSMC and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSkin, hair, and nail diseases can greatly impact psychosocial well-being, making an accurate diagnosis essential. Skin biopsies are a key diagnostic tool in dermatology, aiding in identifying and distinguishing various skin conditions. This study was done to determine the spectrum of diseases requiring skin biopsy and the level of clinicopathological concordance. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 5000 skin biopsy records at a tertiary care center over 2 years. Data included demographics, biopsy sites, lesion morphology, clinical indications, and histopathological diagnoses. The Chi-square test assessed the concordance between clinical and histopathological findings ( P < 0.05).

resultsOf 5000 biopsies, 56.2% were from males, with peak incidence in the 35-40 age group. The most biopsied sites were the lower limb (22%), with plaques being the most common lesion morphology (37.9%). Papulosquamous disorders (24.7%) were the leading indication, particularly Lichenoid dermatitis (9.6%), followed by cutaneous infections (14.7%), mainly mycobacterial (9.2%). Lichen planus (6.2%) and psoriasis (4.5%) were the most frequent histopathological diagnoses. Overall, clinicopathological concordance was 86%, with 50.6% full and 35.4% partial concordance. Variability in concordance rates was seen across disease categories.

conclusionSkin biopsy plays a vital role in diagnosing dermatological conditions, with an 86% concordance rate. Variability across conditions highlights the importance of clinicopathological correlation and careful clinical evaluation.

Indexed as

SkinSkin DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPsoriasisRetrospective StudiesEpidermolytic hyperkeratosisgranulomatouslichen planuspsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID42301682
PMCPMC13390951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.