ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Blood Never Lies: The PopPK-Based Lie Detector.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAccurate assessment of drug adherence is essential for long-term oral therapies, where self-administration is unsupervised. Conventional tools such as self-reports, electronic monitors, and even therapeutic drug monitoring often fail to detect non-adherence. Population pharmacokinetic modeling improves objectivity but typically relies on a single analyte, which may still miss hidden non-adherence. We propose a bi-analyte population pharmacokinetic-based approach that uses both the parent drug and a metabolite with distinct pharmacokinetics to enhance adherence detection and reconstruct likely dosing histories.
methodsA literature review identified spironolactone and its metabolite canrenone as suitable candidates, based on long-term use and an available population pharmacokinetic model capturing distinct elimination profiles. Virtual patients were simulated under steady-state assumptions, then exposed to various adherence scenarios. A modified Metropolis-Hastings algorithm jointly estimated individual pharmacokinetic parameters and dosing patterns by analyzing simulated drug and metabolite concentrations. The probability of taking 0, 1, or 2 tablets per day was inferred, and a posterior adherence probability was derived from the posterior distribution to quantify adherence likelihood. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic performance.
resultsThe combined use of parent and metabolite improved non-adherence detection compared with either alone, particularly for recent missed doses. Trough concentrations outperformed peak concentrations, especially when patients did not compensate with extra doses.
conclusionsThis probabilistic bi-analyte approach enhances non-adherence detection and is adaptable to other pharmacokinetic settings where distinct profiles and low model variability are present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.