ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Educating Adolescents About Assessing Mental Health During Well Care Visits.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGrowing rates of mental illness among the pediatric population have led to increased morbidity and mortality, with suicide being the second leading cause of death among children aged 10-14. Barriers to mental health (MH) care, including limited access to resources, stigma, and education, perpetuate the crisis. Pediatric primary care providers must seize every opportunity to bridge this gap. This project created an age-appropriate virtual educational program for adolescents aged 12 to 18 on the MH assessment tool, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which is commonly used during well-child visits.
methodsA clinician‑authored slide deck was converted into a 10‑minute Articulate Storyline
resultsAs a clinician-designed module not yet formally deployed to the target population, formative feedback was limited to informal review by four adolescent testers prior to final release. Teen testers who reviewed the material requested shorter card-back text, an option to replay narration, and higher color contrast on negative-emotion cards.
conclusionBy grounding the module in the validated PHQ-9 screening tool and evidence-based instructional design principles, and by engaging key stakeholders, the interactive virtual educational program bridges critical MH gaps by educating and empowering adolescents to understand their mental well-being and proactively engage in their care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.