ReviewJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Linking patent foramen ovale with atrial cardiomyopathy: a narrative review of clinical signals, electrophysiology, and translational opportunities.
Review in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patent Foramen Ovale on Transthoracic Echocardiography and Brain White-Matter Hyperintensities: A Transportability Analysis and Practice-Anchored Risk Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative, hypothesis-generating review examines whether patent foramen ovale (PFO), usually discussed through stroke prevention, may be linked to atrial cardiomyopathy (AtCM) in selected large-shunt and/or atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) phenotypes. We synthesize heterogeneous clinical imaging, electrophysiology, hemodynamic, and translational data rather than a formal systematic evidence base. Observational cohorts and small mechanistic studies suggest associations between high-shunt PFO phenotypes and left atrial enlargement, impaired mechanics, atrial vulnerability (e.g., shorter effective refractory periods or atrial fibrillation inducibility), and post-ablation arrhythmia recurrence; these signals are phenotype-specific, potentially confounded, and do not establish causality. We propose a candidate high-shunt PFO research phenotype based on shunt magnitude and septal morphology (contrast echocardiography and TEE features), with atrial substrate and electrophysiology (EP) measures treated as downstream modifiers/endpoints. Closure-related reverse remodeling, antiarrhythmic effects, and heart-failure outcomes should be interpreted cautiously because existing evidence is largely non-randomized. We outline candidate "shunt-on vs shunt-off" studies with prespecified EP endpoints integrated with hemodynamics and multimodal imaging to test causality, reversibility, and net clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.