Observational studyJournal of neurology2026
Cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome in Friedreich Ataxia.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Trial Readiness for SCA1 and SCA3
Patient-reported, Health Economic and Psychosocial Outcomes in Friedreich Ataxia
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing evidence suggests that cognition and affect may be affected in Friedreich Ataxia (FA).
objectivesTo investigate the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS) in patients with FA and evaluate its correlations with speech and clinical parameters.
methodsPatients were recruited from the PROFA study (NCT05943002), a prospective observational cohort in France, Germany, and Austria. Assessments included clinical scales (Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale-Activities of Daily Living, FARS-ADL, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia), the CCAS scale, and patient-reported outcomes. Controls data were obtained from the READISCA study (NCT03487367).
resultsA total of 101 patients with FA and 43 controls with similar ages were included (35.4 ± 14.9 years vs 38.8 ± 9.5 years, p = 0.11). The mean CCAS total raw score was lower in patients than in controls (92.4 ± 13.7 vs 104.0 ± 8.5, p < 0.001), with a higher rate of definite CCAS (47% vs 12%, p < 0.001). The most frequently impaired cognitive functions in FA were phonemic fluency (44% vs 14%, p < 0.001), categoric switching (41% vs 9%, p < 0.001), and semantic fluency (20% vs 2%, p = 0.007). In multivariate models, CCAS total raw score increased with higher education and decreased with FARS-ADL (both p < 0.001). Dysarthria had no significant effect on total or item-level CCAS scores after adjustment for education, FARS-ADL, mean GAA repeats, and study center (all p > 0.15). DISCUSSION: Definite CCAS is common in FA, with deficits in phonemic fluency, categoric switching, and semantic fluency. Cognitive impairment appears independent of dysarthria severity, suggesting CCAS is an intrinsic manifestation of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.