Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42301508›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2026

In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Octenidine Against Emerging Dermatophyte Species.

Kathrin Spettel, Richard Kriz, Sarah Fellhuber, Madita Loy, Hannah Tiefenbrunner, Melanie Schabransky, Sonia Galazka, Birgit Willinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathrin SpettelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8901-8770
Richard KrizDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-2927
Sarah FellhuberDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Madita LoyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hannah TiefenbrunnerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Melanie SchabranskyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sonia GalazkaDepartment for Integrative Risk Assessment, Division for Risk Assessment, Data and Statistics, AGES - Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6979-5302
Birgit WillingerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. birgit.willinger@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7921-5749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dermatophytes cause a wide range of superficial infections of the skin, hair and nails, with high global prevalence and considerable public health relevance. Treatment regimens for dermatophytosis are limited to few antifungal drug classes, and rising resistance-particularly to terbinafine-further compromises therapeutic efficacy. Topical antiseptics such as octenidine (OCT) may represent a promising option for infection control and local therapy. This study investigated the in vitro antifungal activity of the pure antiseptic OCT (at final assay concentrations of 0.1% and 0.05%) and two OCT-based commercial ready-to-use medicinal products (octeniderm® and octenisept®) against clinical isolates of emerging (drug-resistant) dermatophytes including Trichophyton rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, T. tonsurans, T. interdigitale, T. indotineae and Microsporum canis. Quantitative suspension assays were conducted according to EN 13624:2013 under low organic load (0.3 g/L bovine serum albumin) and high organic load (3 g/L bovine serum albumin, 3 mL/L defibrinated sheep blood), with contact times ranging from 1 to 15 min. Results showed that the active OCT itself as well as the skin antiseptic octeniderm® and the wound and mucous membrane antiseptic octenisept® are effective against the tested dermatophytes in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Notably, octeniderm® was able to inhibit fungal growth within 1 min, even under high organic load conditions. These in vitro findings suggest that OCT, a well-tolerated antiseptic already in clinical use represents a potential option for preventing transmission and managing superficial infections caused by (drug-resistant) dermatophytes.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsArthrodermataceaeMicrosporumPyridinesTrichophytonAnimalsDermatomycosesHumansIminesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsIminesoctenidinePyridinesAntisepticsDermatophytesOctenidineResistanceTerbinafine

Identifiers

PMID42301508
PMCPMC13272275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.