Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42301477›Full record

ReviewHNO2026

[Phoniatric care for disorders of the professional singing voice].

Dirk Mürbe, Bernhard Richter

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dirk MürbeKlinik für Audiologie und Phoniatrie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. dirk.muerbe@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0556-4213
Bernhard RichterFreiburger Institut für Musikermedizin, Hochschule für Musik und Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1497-559X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany, approximately 8% of the population uses their singing voice professionally or semi-professionally, while approximately 18% of children and young people sing in organised ensembles. Of all occupational groups, singers have the highest demands on vocal quality and performance, and even among semi-professionals, singing is often associated with high strain on the vocal apparatus. The requirements vary considerably, depending on whether the context is solo singing or singing in a choir, and they are also dependent on the chosen musical genre and the use of electroacoustic amplification. The considerable vocal load leads to a high prevalence of voice disorders, with respiratory tract infections and vocal fatigue being the most common conditions affecting the singing voice. Phoniatric care for singers requires specific diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for voice disorders as well as corresponding knowledge and skills on the part of the practitioner. These include both the expansion of standardised protocols for modular voice diagnostics and individualised selection and combination of therapeutic options. The latter include voice rest, vocal therapeutic and medication components, and, if necessary, phonosurgical procedures. Additionally, successful restoration of the function and resilience of the singing voice requires preventative measures tailored to the functional characteristics of professional voices.

Indexed as

PhoniatricsPhonosurgeryProfessional voiceSinging voiceVoice disorders

Identifiers

PMID42301477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.