ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
What are the ethical, legal and social considerations for recording, sharing and utilizing surgical videos? A thematic analysis and framework to guide stakeholders.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurgical videos have tremendous value for education, research, quality improvement and innovation. Yet, recording, storing, sharing and utilizing this form of data are fraught with challenges. This study aims to produce a roadmap for stakeholders to conceptualize key ethical, legal, and social considerations for acquiring and engaging with surgical videos within their institution and in collaboration with external companies. The resulting framework is rooted in the experiences and perspectives of surgeons and industry professionals.
methodsAn international cohort of 38 surgeons and medical device industry members participated in focus group discussion to reflect on their experiences with navigating surgical data recording policy within their institution and in partnership with external parties. Transcripts from the focus group discussions were coded using inductive and deductive thematic analysis to develop a framework of participants' experiences.
resultsKey issues of ethical, intellectual property and legal considerations were identified that transcended any institution or jurisdiction. Participants reported little to no existence or awareness of institutional policies surrounding issues of ownership and commercialization. We summarize considerations related to patient and personnel consent, ethical principles, and data storage, security, access, and ownership. Our framework guides stakeholders stepwise through key issues, with recommendations and considerations to protect all involved parties.
conclusionA framework was developed to guide surgeons, institutions and industry partners through key considerations when acquiring surgical videos for various applications. There is a strong need for additional guidelines on the recording, sharing and use of surgical video data to ensure fairness and safety for patients, staff, and external partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.