ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Surgeon practice patterns drive procedural cost variation in appendectomy without improving short-term outcomes.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppendectomy is a common emergency general surgery procedure and is now performed predominantly using minimally invasive techniques. While robotic platforms have diffused in elective general surgery, their role in appendectomy remains limited. Surgeon-level cost variation in emergency general surgery is not well defined.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing appendectomy across a large integrated healthcare system from 2017 to 2025. Operative approach was categorized as open, laparoscopic, or robotic. The primary outcome was total direct procedural cost. Secondary outcomes included operating room (OR) time, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and 30-day reintervention. Hierarchical mixed-effects regression models with surgeons nested within hospitals were used to evaluate associations between operative approach, provider-level effects, cost, and outcomes.
resultsThe cohort included 11,153 patients treated by 286 surgeons across 26 hospitals. Laparoscopic appendectomy accounted for 95.3% of cases, robotic for 2.4%, and open for 2.3%. Substantial procedural cost variation persisted after adjustment. Surgeon-level effects accounted for approximately 28% of residual cost variation, compared with 11% attributable to hospitals, with an interdecile range of adjusted surgeon-specific cost effects exceeding $400 per case. Robotic appendectomy was independently associated with higher procedural cost but remained infrequently utilized. Higher operative cost was associated with longer OR time and longer LOS, without improvement in short-term outcomes. Thirty-day reintervention was uncommon (0.84%) and was independently associated with operative approach and patient acuity, but not with higher spending or provider-level effects.
conclusionsIn appendectomy, surgeon practice patterns are a dominant driver of procedural cost variation, while higher spending does not confer improvements in efficiency or short-term clinical outcomes. These findings demonstrate a disconnect between cost and value in emergency general surgery and identify surgeon-focused cost transparency and selective standardization as practical, actionable strategies to improve value without compromising patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.