ArticleForensic toxicology2026
Development of a similarity discrimination method for cannabis samples using Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat-PCR.
Article in Forensic toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn forensic cannabis investigations, it is important not only to prove that seized materials are cannabis or not but also to clarify the relationship between cannabis samples. This study aimed to establish a method for evaluating the similarity of the genetic background of cannabis samples using Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR)-PCR analysis, a variant of DNA testing.
methodsForty-eight cannabis samples from 24 strains were collected. ISSR-PCR was performed using 10 ISSR primers, and the resulting band patterns were used for grouping. After analyzing the characteristics of each primer using a binary classification method, two numerical indicators, the similarity score and total likelihood ratio, were calculated to comprehensively evaluate the similarity between samples and assess their discrimination performance.
resultsCannabis samples were grouped into band patterns using ISSR-PCR, but no single primer classified all strains. The "similarity score" (0-10), based on primers showing the same band pattern across 10 ISSR-PCRs, averaged 1.69 between different strains, 4.34 between individuals of the identical strain, and 9.48 for the identical individual. The mean "total likelihood ratio" calculated from the positive and negative likelihood ratios for binary classification using 10 primers was 1.28 × 10⁰, 1.11 × 10⁵, and 9.79 × 10⁹, respectively. Each indicator demonstrated high discrimination performance in evaluating genetic similarity.
conclusionsThis study established numerical criteria for estimating the genetic similarity between unknown cannabis samples based on ISSR-PCR results using 10 primers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301402What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.