ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Minimal head injury in asymptomatic patients on antithrombotic therapy: is in-hospital observation justified after an initial normal computed tomography scan?
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients receiving antithrombotic therapy are frequently admitted for in-hospital observation after head trauma despite a normal initial cranial computed tomography (CT) scan. The clinical value of routine observation in asymptomatic patients with minimal head injury remains uncertain. This study evaluated the incidence of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DIH) and the relevance of routine hospital observation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥ 18 years) receiving antithrombotic therapy who presented with minimal head injury, defined as the absence of loss of consciousness, amnesia, disorientation, or neurological symptoms and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. All patients had a normal initial cranial CT. Cases were identified from an institutional trauma database between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients with traumatic brain injury, prior intracranial hemorrhage, or abnormal initial imaging were excluded. According to institutional protocol, patients receiving acetylsalicylic acid monotherapy underwent home observation, whereas other antithrombotic regimens, including anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents, required admission. A total of 5800 patients met inclusion criteria (median age 83 years, interquartile range 77-88). Of these, 3697 were admitted and 2103 were managed as outpatients. During follow-up, 179 unique patients (3.1%) developed delayed neurological symptoms and underwent repeat CT imaging. DIH was detected in 9 patients (0.2%). Two cases occurred within 24 h; the remainder were diagnosed between three and nine days after injury. No patient required neurosurgical intervention. DIH after minimal head injury in asymptomatic patients receiving antithrombotic therapy is rare, suggesting limited clinical benefit of routine in-hospital observation after a normal CT scan. Trial registration: 'retrospectively registered' (1057/2023). Level of evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.