ArticleObesity surgery2026
Low-impact laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A preliminary study of feasibility, safety and early outcomes using a single-incision low-pressure pneumoperitoneum approach.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with severe obesity are particularly vulnerable to the physiological effects of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). Low-pressure laparoscopy may reduce cardiopulmonary stress and postoperative pain; however, its feasibility in MBS remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and early outcomes of a low-impact laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LIL-SG) technique, combining single-incision access with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in patients with severe obesity.
methodsData from consecutive patients undergoing LIL-SG were prospectively collected, analyzed and compared with a matched retrospective cohort undergoing conventional SILS-SG. Patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² or complex anatomical or cardiopulmonary conditions were excluded. Pneumoperitoneum was maintained at 10-12mmHg, with temporary increases to 14mmHg permitted if necessary. Primary outcomes included intraoperative feasibility, operative parameters, and early postoperative outcomes, including pain and opioid consumption.
resultsLIL-SG was successfully completed in 36 consecutive patients without conversion, additional trocar placement, or intraoperative complications. Pneumoperitoneum ≤ 12 mmHg was maintained in 72.2% of cases; temporary increases were required in 27.8% of patients (median duration: 12 min). Median operative time was 58 min, median blood loss was 10 mL. Overall postoperative morbidity was 8.3% (minor non-surgical complications). Mortality was null. Postoperative pain scores decreased rapidly, accompanied by reduction in opioid use; no patient required opioids after discharge. Safe discharge criteria were met by postoperative day 2 in 94.4% of patients. Preliminary comparative analysis with a matched cohort of patients undergoing conventional SILS-SG demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements in the LIL-SG group, while length of hospital stay tended to be shorter without reaching statistical significance.
conclusionsLIL-SG combining single-incision access with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible and safe in carefully selected patients with severe obesity, offering favorable intraoperative performance, low morbidity, reduced postoperative pain, and decreased opioid requirements. Further comparative and long-term studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.