Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42301328›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

Cervical spine clearance in pediatric trauma patients - Consensus algorithm of the Pediatric Spinal Trauma Group of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery (DGOU).

Julia Bolte, Hauke Rüther, Pia Brecht, Dina Wilma Wiersbicki, Yasmin Youssef, Jan-Sven Jarvers, Alexander Carl Disch

Abstract readConsensus StatementLetter
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia Bolte *University Comprehensive Spine Center (UCSC), University Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. Julia.Bolte@universitätsklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2930-8274
Hauke Rüther *Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-233X
Pia BrechtDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dina Wilma WiersbickiDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Yasmin YoussefDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Jan-Sven Jarvers *Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexander Carl Disch *University Comprehensive Spine Center (UCSC), University Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-4041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough cervical spine injuries in pediatric patients are rare, clinical and radiological examinations are clinical routine. Currently, no standardized decision algorithm does exist for detection of these injuries in the European region. The proposed algorithm is aiming to safely identify significant injuries through consistent diagnostics while minimizing immobilization and radiation exposure at the same time.

methodsThe Pediatric Spinal Trauma Group of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) developed an algorithm based on own scientific investigations and considering primary and secondary literature. The algorithm was developed through a formal consensus process and thereby aligns with international recommendations.

resultsThe algorithm uses the initial pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale (pGCS) to group patients to three treatment pathways. Resulting recommendations for imaging, clinical re-assessment, and further management include the child's age, trauma mechanism, and clinical evaluations.

conclusionDespite their rarity, potential cervical spine injury in children requires accurate diagnosis. Clinical examinations can be challenging, especially in children with compromised consciousness. Increased radiation exposure from X-rays and computer tomography (CT) scans must be considered, particularly as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) availability is sometimes limited and often requires more resources as sedation or anesthesia in younger children. The introduced algorithm uses standardized pathways for the diagnosis of pediatric cervical spine injuries aiming to reduce the number of missed injuries as well as diagnostic delays, minimize unnecessary radiation exposure, and optimize healthcare resource utilization. Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCervical VertebraeSpinal InjuriesChildChild, PreschoolGermanyGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedCervical spine clearance in pediatricImaging of the pediatric cervical spinePediatric cervical spine injuriesPediatric spinal trauma

Identifiers

PMID42301328
PMCPMC13272246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.