ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
The evolving role of MRI in abdominopelvic emergencies: from problem-solving to first-line imaging.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute abdominopelvic pain requires rapid imaging triage, traditionally dominated by computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US). However, advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including accelerated acquisition, motion-robust sequences, and non-contrast protocols, have expanded its role beyond a problem-solving tool toward selective first-line imaging in specific clinical scenarios. This review provides a decision-based framework for MRI utilization in nontraumatic abdominopelvic emergencies, integrating current evidence on diagnostic performance, workflow considerations, and clinical impact. MRI offers clear advantages in radiation-sensitive populations (pregnant and pediatric patients), in biliary obstruction, and for characterizing pancreatic complications, while remaining complementary in most other emergency settings. We highlight high-yield indications where MRI may replace or precede CT, supported by comparative data, and provide practical, rapid MRI protocols (< 15 min) adaptable to emergency workflows. Importantly, we present a balanced discussion of real-world constraints, including availability, cost, scan time, and patient tolerance, that currently limit universal adoption. MRI should therefore be viewed not as a universal replacement for CT, but as a targeted, high-value imaging strategy in selected emergency scenarios where it improves diagnostic confidence, avoids ionizing radiation, and influences management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301286What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.