ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Discriminating papillary renal cell carcinoma from metanephric adenoma: a quantitative contrast-enhanced CT-based analysis.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetanephric adenoma (MA) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) demonstrate overlapping hypovascular appearances on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), yet reliable quantitative imaging criteria for their preoperative differentiation are still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative parameters derived from multiphasic CECT for differentiating MA from pRCC.
methodsNinety-three patients with pathologically confirmed renal tumors (MA, n = 31; pRCC, n = 62) were retrospectively included. CT attenuation values of renal tumors and the ipsilateral renal cortex were measured on unenhanced (UP), corticomedullary (CMP), and nephrographic (NP) phases in all 93 patients, and on the excretory (EP) phase in 84 patients (26 MA, 58 pRCC) as EP images were unavailable in the remaining nine patients. Multiple quantitative parameters were derived. After standardization, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors, and several multivariable diagnostic models were constructed and compared.
resultsUnivariable analysis demonstrated significant differences between pRCC and MA in age, sex, and multiple quantitative parameters derived from the NP and EP. Among these parameters, the absolute tumor enhancement difference between the excretory and unenhanced phases (EP
conclusionQuantitative CECT parameters, particularly those derived from the delayed phases (nephrographic and excretory)-including absolute tumor attenuation values, absolute tumor enhancement differences, absolute tumor-to-cortex ratios, and relative tumor-to-cortex ratios-demonstrate substantial potential for the noninvasive differentiation between MA and pRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301284What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.