ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Intrahepatic lithiasis in Western populations: an underrecognized diagnosis and its mimickers.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrahepatic lithiasis (IHL), defined as the presence of calculi within the intrahepatic bile ducts proximal to the hepatic confluence, has traditionally been considered rare in Western populations. However, increasing evidence suggests that Low-Phospholipid-Associated-Cholelithiasis (LPAC) syndrome, which is a genetic cholangiopathy caused by ABCB4 variants affecting biliary phospholipid secretion, represents a frequently underrecognized cause of IHL.The imaging spectrum of IHL varies according to stone composition and underlying etiology. In Eastern populations, pigment stones associated with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis prevail, whereas in Western patients, cholesterol microlithiasis characteristic of LPAC syndrome is more common. Targeted hepatobiliary ultrasound remains the cornerstone diagnostic modality, capable of detecting findings that are frequently missed on routine examination. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonancecholangiopancreatography (MRCP) provide complementary information regarding stone characterization, biliary anatomy, and complications.Accurate diagnosis requires familiarity with the major mimickers of IHL, including primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Caroli disease, iatrogenicbiliary strictures, and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, as well as recognition of imaging pitfalls such as pneumobilia and biliary hamartomas.Greater awareness of LPAC syndrome and careful analysis of biliary imaging patterns may enable radiologists to reframe intrahepatic lithiasisfrom an overlooked finding into a diagnosable and treatable condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.